Concepts of Assessing, Assuring, and Improving Quality Medicare NCBI Bookshelf

Several aspects of the continuous improvement model resemble those of contemporary systems of quality assurance or performance monitoring described a decade or more ago for the health care field. These systems include the bi-cycle concepts of Brown and Uhl (1970) and the health accounting approach of Williamson12 (1978, 1988), both of which have cycles quite analogous to the planning-doing-checking-acting (PDCA) approach. Moreover, both approaches incorporate notions of structure (e.g., organizational factors and high-level accountability), process (e.g., patient care activities), and outcomes (e.g., patient well-being or satisfaction). For instance, both the traditional and the continuous improvement models of quality assurance stress the importance of outcomes (or achievable benefit); Williamson’s health accounting approach, for instance, starts with achievable benefit not being achieved and works back to the process of care. The main distinction is that the latter more explicitly involves patient (i.e., customer) values as a critical element of outcomes. Both approaches also acknowledge the importance of information that links processes to outcome.

QA focuses on planning, defining quality objectives, implementing quality control measures, conducting audits, and continuously improving processes to enhance overall quality. The lesson is that no single approach or conceptual framework is likely either to suit our purposes or to meet the criteria we have identified for an effective quality assurance program. What seems clear to this committee is that achieving good quality of home and community-based services will require a variety of both external and internal programs.

Flagging issues and changing strategy to be more quality management focused

Structural measures, the characteristics of the resources in the health care delivery system, apply to individual practitioners, to groups of practitioners, and to organizations and agencies. They are essentially measures of the presumed capacity of the practitioner or provider to deliver quality health care, not of the care itself. Deficiencies in structural measures are not evidence of poor care (and certainly not of poor outcomes); they may, but do not necessarily, point to crucial areas requiring improvement or reform.

Third, when workers cannot attain their best performance, wasteful, needlessly complex, and undependable systems or organizational methods of work are often to blame. Fourth, the interaction of individuals and the organizations and systems within which they practice can always improve. A quality assurance program must be understandable and reasonable to the public and to the health professionals who are subject to assessment; it must reflect their quality objectives and respond to their quality complaints. The program’s methods should have clinical relevance to practitioners for the kind of care they provide, and it should include appropriate adjustments for nonpractitioner-related variables. For the public it should illuminate decision making relevant to those aspects of health care under patient or regulatory control.

Origin of quality assurance

The continuous improvement model, first of all, emphasizes continual efforts to improve performance and value even when high performance standards appear to be met. In the latter case, traditional quality assurance activities would cease or shift attention elsewhere. Second, continuous improvement stresses the evaluation of simple and complex systems from the perspectives of the customers. This has the effect, among other things, of directing attention to the way people and departments in organizations work together and, thus, to sources of variation and multidisciplinary quality-of-care issues that traditional quality assurance approaches might not detect or target for change. Third, it emphasizes understanding the views of patients and other customers about the care process and their outcomes.

It is beneficial to have experience and knowledge of Minitab, which is a statistical software used in quality management is beneficial. This software discovers and predicts patterns, uncovers hidden relationships between variables, and creates visualizations, which cloud quality assurance can help make processes more efficient. There are a number of industry-standard frameworks and certifications designed to help businesses ensure product quality. Many businesses take a random sampling of customer service calls and chats to evaluate service quality.

Importance of quality assurance

The long-term-care (LTC) ombudsman program is mandated to investigate complaints made by residents of B&C facilities and to advocate on their behalf. In a few states ombudsmen also investigate home care complaints, but the implementation of such programs has been extremely limited to date (IOM, 1994). An additional six states have issued draft regulations or have legislation pending that would establish such a regulatory program. Throughout the country, many local officials such as county fire marshals, health inspectors, and building inspectors also exert considerable influence on and regulation of residential care facilities.

You can also see what keeps an organization from working to its full potential. Another essential concept in quality management is lean management, a system of techniques that aims to eliminate all non-value-adding activities and waste from a business. As both QA and QC intend to reduce or eliminate waste, knowledge of Lean manufacturing would improve your skills. Another difference between QA and QC is that QA is proactive, while QC is reactive to any glitches or problems found.

Risks and issues

Greenfield (1989), for instance, cautions about the importance of choosing the right kinds of measures. Organizations benefit when they structurally integrate Quality in a Business Process Management (BPM) and Management Information System (MIS) framework with software. This can be accomplished through the implementation of an Integrated Enterprise Excellence (IEE) business management system and its Enterprise Performance Reporting System (EPRS) software.

These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word ‚quality assurance.‘ Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. • Planning Phase – The company could create process-related objectives and identify the procedures needed to achieve a high-quality result. The goal of software QA testing is to provide the best possible result to the client. They are not only finding the bug but also finding all the problems that affect the end-user experience. The BLS also reports that the median annual wage for software developers, quality assurance analysts, and testers is $109,020 The job outlook is expected to grow 25 percent from 2021 to 2031 [2].

Lean management

It provides well-motivated people with timely information to improve their practice. Two essential functions of a quality assurance program are the correction of identified problems and the improvement of care generally. If a quality assurance program is to fulfill these functions, it must be able to provide practitioners with timely data at a level of aggregation or disaggregation clinically relevant to their practice. This implies that the data should be based if at all possible on rates, so that comparisons can be made to standards of practice. When problems in individual care are detected, interventions must be sufficiently timely to prevent further harm to that patient and to others who might be at risk.

• Second, in some states, deemed status allows providers to bypass the state survey process, which they may regard as more intrusive, onerous, or unenlightening than the professional accreditation effort.
• The relative goodness of various outcomes and patient preferences (or utilities) for different combinations of quantity and quality of life and health must be taken into account.
• Either way, the result of quality control is to determine any faults before a product goes into mass production, or makes it into the hands of clients and customers.
• Such programs cannot be regarded a priori as the answer to effective quality management, however.
• Through mechanisms such as the threat of exposure, imposition of financial sanctions, or withdrawal of accreditation or licensure status, they may be able to deal with outliers (and especially to remove them).
• Conversely, internal case managers may want to maximize service use if they are being paid on a fee-for-service basis and might arrange unnecessary services.
• In any case, no quality assurance system can rely solely on coercion through sanctions applied at a time and place remote from the site of care.

The theory of constraints (TOC) methodology identifies bottlenecks and constraints. This is key in QA and QC processes because both aim to make development more efficient. Having a separate quality assurance team means you have a more impartial judge for whether you’re delivering quality or not. With the use of technology, this team doesn’t even have to be extensive. Ensuring you’re consistently offering a great service is made much easier with responsibility passed to a dedicated team.

ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AND IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES

A quality assurance program is incomplete without a focus on improving the processes through which patient care is delivered, and these processes involve individuals throughout the health care organization, practice, or institution. On the broader external level, quality assurance should strive to improve the health care delivery system as a whole. These points lay the groundwork for the conceptual framework, empirical questions, and recommendations about a further study that are taken up in Chapter 4.

History of ISO and QA

Outcomes are the end results of care—the effect of the care process on the health and well-being of patients and populations. One outcomes list comprises “the five Ds”—death, disease, disability, discomfort, and dissatisfaction (Elinson, 1987). More positively they may be thought of as survival, states of physiologic, physical, and emotional health, and satisfaction (Lohr, 1988).

Excellence inside an organization is not the same as quality judged by the customer. With this understanding you may realize why a number of High-Quality (in your view) companies fail and some Low-Quality (in your view) are successful. It cost me $100 and it uses my phone to show the time, the weather, caller ID, text messages, sports scores, Run keeper outputs during exercising, and a few other functions. I can look up movie schedules and use it to change songs on my phone or take a picture. I use it often in noisy places because it vibrates on a call or text and I don’t miss calls. I will use it exercising when I can bring my phone and it will track and report speed and miles when jogging, walking, and bike riding.

• Lino Kuhn
• 0 comments